Mexican congresswoman Ana María Jiménez Ortiz must lead a very sheltered and unvaried sexual life in the bedroom. I don't think her sex life exists outside the marital bed nor in any position other than the ordinary. Which means from what female friends have told me probably means she has experienced very many, or very intense experiences.
The reason I am saying this is that Ana Maria Jiménez Ortiz has come up with the following as a definition of marriage
'marriage should only be considered in those relationships in which the members have sex while facing each other.'
So I'm asking, does this mean that when a couple engage in doggy style (see below) that they rescind their marriage vows?
But there is another side to this argument, gay men can and do have sex facing each other. It is not a physical impossibility.
Exhibit A the octopus:
Exhibit B the cowboy:
There are of course many variations some of which face the partner and some of which face away for both straight and gay couples. Which brings me to the following conclusion, Ana María Jiménez Ortiz is favour of marriage for all as it is anatomically possible for any blend of homo sapiens to have sex either facing their partner or not, whether it is one man and one woman, or two women or two men. Therefore with a slight alteration may I suggest:
'Marriage should only be considered in those relationships in which the humans having sex can anatomically face each other should they so choose.'
So well done Ms Jiménez Ortiz for almost coming up with a fully inclusive definition of marriage.